4 thinking flaws you should avoid to become more objective and rational

 |   |  Disclaimer: Links to some products earn us a commission

I see 4 fundamental flaws in how people think. This is where you begin to start thinking critically about the world.

Flaw 1 – A False dichotomy:

People think in ‘Or’.

Things are Black or White,

It’s Nature or Nurture,

It’s Democracy or Dictatorship,

It’s good or bad,

It is right for you or wrong for you,

People don’t often see a multi-faceted world. It is often that something can have 2 or more states at the same time. For example, a person can have 4 different professional skills. That person does not HAVE to be one of the 4 things. A movie isn’t good or bad. It can be broken down into a million small units that can be evaluated. IQ is not genes or upbringing, it’s both. Sexual preferences, both. Certain food items are not bad or good. See them in the right context – they will both be good or bad, or in between, depending on the context! But, black or white is easy to communicate and easy to conceptualize. That is why people adhere to that anyway.

A dichotomy in thinking and opinions reduces everything to something lesser than it is. It kills the context and specific interactions in how the world works.

A dichotomy in thinking and opinions reduces everything to something lesser than it is. It kills the context and specific interactions in how the world works. Click To Tweet

Flaw 2 – Correlation is not causation:

Just because 2 things happen together does not mean one caused the other.

Correlation means: 2 or more things occur together. Like your breaths and the suns rays in some parts of the world. Think of it, bad events take place all the time, there is almost always a president in a country. Does that mean that the president causes the bad events? Sometimes, not always.

Causation means: something is necessary to make some event happen. Like power supply is NEEDED to make a light bulb shine.

There are many missing elements in between 2 things that correlated. Hunt for those. You’ll realize that there are so many variables to consider that correlation stops seeming like causation then. Your attention can address those other variables.

Superstitions can be born this way. Wore a orange colored underwear for an interview and you did well? Yes? How many of you have repeated that underwear (or other clothing items) on the next interview??

Special note: Correlation and causation become the same thing in special contexts- like how the brain learns. Sometimes neural circuits cause other circuits to fire and facilitate a behavior just because they happen together often. Read more about it here

Flaw 3 – Anecdotes:

Stories are just stories, not hard evidence.

Stories are just stories, not hard evidence. The world needs to work on scientific evidence, not anecdotes. Click To Tweet

When did stories become reliable evidence? Stories are stories. They are told, retold, paraphrased, misinterpreted, embellished, and misrepresented for a lot of reasons. Yet, people add a lot of truth value to a story like it is a hard fact.

Furthermore, stories are accounted as per the biases and perspectives of the beholder. That alone makes it an unreliable depiction of the truth. So why do people believe stories more than hard evidence? (scope for discussion????). But that’s not the aim here.

People do believe stories, often more than facts. Be it the efficacy of a doctor, the living conditions at a certain destination, health risks of certain substances, etc. How to succeed at something? How to get more likes on Facebook, etc. anecdotes get more value than empirical evidence. Weird world.

Two things that confound this problem:

The confirmation bias: People look for evidence that corroborates their own beliefs about something. It’s the meanest bias. Read more here.

The survivorship bias: People form impressions based on stories that survive to be told. Stories that don’t spread also have value. Looking only at surviving or success stories skews our perspective. Try listening to failure stories, they are a hidden treasure of insight. Read more here.

Help me run this site with a donation :)

Flaw 4 – The Majority is correct:

Well, many of us act like it, but pretend not to believe it!

I agree, people are quite sharp today and realize that majorities often make mistakes in representing something. Democracy anyone???

But, social psychology shows that people tend to follow the actions of other people even though they think that conformity is going to lead to something harmful, conformity is the strongest incentive between money, morality, and functionality!

People like to follow people, even though they are wrong, and they know it! So ideas can spread like wildfire, opinions can change overnight, and unnecessary useless things like the brand of cat food a celebrity uses and how that celebrity once got drunk and forced their partner to eat it in some weird kinky game become headlines.

Memetics, the spread of information between people, as Richard Dawkins said, is very volatile.

People cause the spread of things and I have come to believe that people can make ‘anything’ a ‘thing’ just by being people. 

I MEAN, WE DID SURGERY ON A GRAPE. WE DID SURGERY ON A GRAPE. WTH? We can make anything a thing. We cause the spread of information that the majority reflects. The majority can be wrong, beware. Click To Tweet

An ending note: It’s easier to be wrong together than right alone, that’s what probably goes in that big head of a network we call humans! 

Fundamental thinking flaws you should avoid to become more rational and objective

So yeah, 4 flaws about humans that also make up what we call the human experience! Fascinating creatures we are. These are the flaws you should avoid to improve critical thinking. 

Thank you for reading thus far, if you are interested in reading more content on psychology and the brain written by me, subscribe to my blog for weekly updates:)

Was this useful?

Average rating 5 / 5. Vote count: 1

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

Check out these quick visual stories

The scientific truth behind ‘Fake it till you make it’

Am I Weird? Yes, You Are. And That’s As Normal As You Can Be.


Join 3,465 other subscribers

2 thoughts on “4 thinking flaws you should avoid to become more objective and rational”


Your skill level and task difficulty give you 8 moods at work You’re Googling wrong, start searching smarter Write 9x better with these 9 psychological hooks Why social media affects mental health: Hints from 40 studies Why do accidents happen in slow motion? What’s your intelligence type? 8 types mapped to skills What is Emotional Intelligence (EQ)? Very high intelligence has a few downsides Unlock a “value system” for life and relationships Unleash your Energy boosters: Do Simple behaviors first